Anthropic Модели
Изучите все 6 моделей от Anthropic с подробными ценами, плюсами и минусами, а также рекомендациями для разработчиков.
Быстрые рекомендации
Claude Opus 4.8
FlagshipFrontier coding, AI agents
Когда использовать: When you need the absolute latest Anthropic intelligence for complex coding and agent workflows.
Ключевые улучшения
- ◆Latest Anthropic flagship: knowledge cutoff 2025-06 (2 months newer than 4.7)
- ◆Fast mode available for premium speed — 2x faster responses
- ◆1M context window (up from 200K in Claude 4 Opus)
- ◆Same $5/$25 pricing as Opus 4.7 — more capability at same cost
- ◆Improved agentic coding: better multi-step tool orchestration
Плюсы
- Latest Anthropic flagship with 1M context
- Fast mode available for premium speed
- Best-in-class agentic coding
Минусы
- Expensive output at $25/M tokens
- No batch API
- No fine-tuning
Производительность
Мультимодальность
Бенчмарки
Claude Opus 4.7
FlagshipAgentic coding, complex analysis
Когда использовать: Top choice for long-horizon coding agents and complex analytical workloads.
Ключевые улучшения
- ◆SWE-Bench Pro: 64.3% — leads all models on real-world coding
- ◆1M context window — 5x increase over Claude 4 Opus's 200K
- ◆Same $5/$25 pricing as Opus 4.6 with better performance
- ◆Knowledge cutoff: 2025-04 — 1 month newer than Claude 4
- ◆Best-in-class for long-horizon multi-step coding agents
Плюсы
- 1M context window
- 64.3% on SWE-Bench Pro (leads competition)
- Same price as Opus 4.6 with better performance
Минусы
- Still expensive at $5/$25
- No batch API
- No fine-tuning
Производительность
Мультимодальность
Бенчмарки
Агенты, использующие эту модель
1Claude Haiku 4.5
LiteFast, cost-efficient AI tasks
Когда использовать: Best Anthropic value for production chatbots, coding assistants, and agent tasks.
Ключевые улучшения
- ◆Matches Sonnet 4 coding performance at 1/3 the price
- ◆Vision support at lite tier — first Haiku with multimodal capability
- ◆200K context window (same as Claude 4 Opus/Sonnet)
- ◆Knowledge cutoff: 2025-02 — newest at the Haiku tier
- ◆Price: $1/$5 — 5x more than 3.5 Haiku but 3x quality improvement
Плюсы
- Matches Sonnet 4 performance on coding tasks
- Vision support at lite tier
- 200K context window
Минусы
- 5x more expensive than 3.5 Haiku
- 8K max output is limiting
- No fine-tuning
Производительность
Мультимодальность
Бенчмарки
Claude 4 Opus
FlagshipAgentic coding, deep analysis
Когда использовать: When you need the absolute best for complex agentic coding and deep analytical work.
Ключевые улучшения
- ◆SWE-bench Verified: 72.7% — highest agentic coding score at launch
- ◆200K context with 32K max output — 4x Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 8K output
- ◆Batch API available: $7.50/$37.50 — 50% savings for async workloads
- ◆Knowledge cutoff: 2025-03 — 6 months newer than 3.5 Sonnet
- ◆Premium pricing ($15/$75) reflects highest intelligence tier
Плюсы
- Best agentic coding model available
- Superior deep analysis
- Latest knowledge cutoff (2025-03)
Минусы
- Most expensive model in market ($15/$75)
- No fine-tuning
- Slower than Sonnet
Производительность
Мультимодальность
Бенчмарки
Claude 4 Sonnet
FlagshipCoding, writing, analysis
Когда использовать: Best balance of quality and cost for writing, coding, and analysis production apps.
Ключевые улучшения
- ◆SWE-bench: 63.8% — competitive with flagships at 1/5 the price
- ◆Batch API: $1.50/$7.50 — 50% savings for non-real-time workloads
- ◆200K context + 16K output — 2x output of Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- ◆Top-tier writing quality — best for content generation and editing
- ◆Price $3/$15 — replaced Claude 3.5 Sonnet as the default choice
Плюсы
- Top-tier writing quality
- 5x cheaper than Opus
- Excellent coding with 200K context
Минусы
- Lower max output than Opus
- No fine-tuning
- Slower than GPT-4o mini
Производительность
Мультимодальность
Бенчмарки
Агенты, использующие эту модель
40Claude 3.5 Haiku
LiteFast, affordable tasks
Когда использовать: For high-throughput text tasks where you want Anthropic quality on a budget.
Ключевые улучшения
- ◆First budget Anthropic model with 200K context (was 100K in Claude 3 Haiku)
- ◆Prompt caching: $0.08/M — 90% savings for repeated system prompts
- ◆Batch API: $0.40/$2 — 50% savings for async processing
- ◆Claude's nuanced writing style at 1/4 the price of Sonnet
- ◆No vision — text-only; upgrade to Haiku 4.5 for multimodal
Плюсы
- 200K context at budget price
- Claude's nuanced style at low cost
- Good prompt caching savings
Минусы
- No vision support
- No fine-tuning
- 8K max output is limiting
Производительность
Мультимодальность
Бенчмарки
Сравнение бок о бок
| Модель | Уровень | Вход | Выход | Контекст |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Flagship | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M |
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Flagship | $5.00 | $25.00 | 1M |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Lite | $1.00 | $5.00 | 200K |
| Claude 4 Opus | Flagship | $15.00 | $75.00 | 200K |
| Claude 4 Sonnet | Flagship | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K |
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | Lite | $0.800 | $4.00 | 200K |